Behavioural analysis technology is not necessarily a step too far in terms of infringement of civil liberties 
(05/11/2009)
Claims that behavioural analysis technology encroaches on civil liberties and could be a means of tracking individuals on a mass level throughout their lives has been dismissed by Stewart Hefferman, the CEO of UK biometrics company OmniPerception.
Reacting to the article ‘Big Brother is watching you shop’ by Michael Fitzpatrick posted on BBC news online, Mr Hefferman challenged his notion that the technology has negative connotations and was a step too far in terms of infringement of civil liberties.
“The boundary between personalised data and behavioural information is blurred in the article and this tends to sensationalise the content in an unhelpful way, said Mr Hefferman.
“Capturing 'personalised data' will have data protection issues and is a step too far, so in that respect I agree with the author. The technology will be able to do as he says, but that is quite a different issue from actually having the legal freedom to do so,” he continued.
However, Mr Hefferman believes that behavioural analysis, if anonomised is potentially helpful. “Look this has been going on for years – how many large retail shops measure and track footfall? It’s behavioural analysis but it is also depersonalised, so not a threat to personal liberties. In fact in some instances (fire, evacuation, etc.) actually tracking behaviour might save lives.
In his article, Fitzpatrick claims that advertisers are now starting to use cameras to watch us watching the ads. Fitzpatrick uses the example of Germany where developers have placed video cameras into street advertisements attempting to discern people’s emotional reactions to the ads. In response, Mr Hefferman points out that personalised advertising is already a reality and not somewhere in the future.
“Has he ever used Amazon or the plethora of other on-line stores that magically seem to know what I want to buy? Is it personalised, yes. Is it a misuse of my personal data – no because they don’t have it. They just know that customer ID “XYZ” likes classical or jazz CDs etc. One area where I do agree is linking the behavioural patterns with my actual data should not take place without my explicit agreement – and this can certainly be done via some legal framework.”
Related topics: Other biometric systems
Print version | 
Email to a friend | 
Related articles
Data breaches: Trends, costs and best practices gives you all the latest information on securing personal and corporate data, key recommendations for immediate action to improve data security, and how to respond to data breaches.
Other Security news and resources
Security News
Suppliers Directory
Jobs forum
Classifieds
Knowledge base
White papers
Research library
Security books
Special reports
Security interviews
Security companies
Security events
Security links
Security market
Product channels
Access Control Biometrics CCTV Intruder Alarms IT Security Manned Guarding Perimeter Protection Physical Security Remote Monitoring Security Services Fire, Health & Safety Other Security Products
IT Security white papers and research library
Access Control Authentication Data Management Data Security Digital Signatures Email Security Identity Management Internet Security Intrusion Prevention Network Security Remote access security Security Management Security Policies Security Software Security Threats Virus Detection Software Virus Protection VPN Vulnerability Assessment Wireless Security
Security books, guides, standards and toolkits
RFID and Smart Cards books, guides and reference documents Biometric books, guides and reference documents CCTV books, guides and reference documents Intruder alarms and intrusion detection systems books, guides and reference documents Monitoring and surveillance books, guides and reference documents IT Governance, ISO 27001 ISO 17799 and BS 7799 toolkits Fire, Health & Safety books, guides and reference documents
