Consumers Have Fraud Concerns with Current Methods of Identity Verification When Accessing Their Accounts free RSS feed from Security Park
(04/07/2008)

According to a Nuance Communications research, close to 60% of UK consumers admit to forgetting security passwords, and 80% believe there are security gaps in the methods currently in place for confirming identity when accessing their phone and banking accounts.

The 2008 Secure Identification Survey conducted for Nuance by Harris Interactive contains responses from over 500 consumers over 18 years of age who have interacted with customer service in the past 12 months. The 25-minute survey focused on security and identity verification, providing specific insights for telecommunications- and finance-based account access. The survey gathered information on the perception and satisfaction of traditional security methods, such as challenge questions by a live agent and PIN/password schemes, as well as new approaches, such as voice biometrics, retinal scans and more.

Key Findings of the 2008 Secure Identification Survey for the UK:

* There is a need for alternatives: A meager 21% of respondents had no concern regarding access fraud with their telecommunications account, and an even lower 9% had no concern regarding access fraud regarding their bank account - leaving 80% to 90% of consumers who have concerns of fraudulent access to their telco and bank accounts.
* PIN/challenge schemes create security gaps: While the majority of respondents used password/PIN and challenge question schemes to prove their identity with the service provider, 58% admit that they have forgotten their secure information in the past. Writing down forgotten PINs, reusing passwords across multiple accounts and using publicly accessible information on birthdates and mother’s maiden names are just some of the security gaps associated with PIN-based security.
* Perception of speaker verification is strong: Perceptions are strong that speaker verification is superior to current authentication methods.
o 47% believe speaker verification is more secure than PIN-based systems, increasing to 79% who believe speaker verification is more or as secure;
o 47% believe speaker verification is more secure than challenge questions, increasing to 77% who believe speaker verification is more or as secure.

* Strong foundation for acceptance of speaker verification: While still a new technology, 83% of respondents already believe that speaker verification technology is a secure way to protect account access. This high level of acceptance is echoed in the finding that 74% would already be likely/somewhat likely to use a speaker verification service for accessing their accounts. These findings should help to assure organizations that any investment in speaker verification systems will result in strong acceptance and use by their customers.

* Convenience also plays a role: While the top two reasons for using speaker verification are security related, 38% of respondents indicated reasons of convenience including ‘it is easier than other verification methods,’ ‘won’t have to remember password/PIN,’ and ‘would reduce the call duration.’

* Speaker verification for market advantage: 55% of respondents stated that they “would prefer to do business with a company that offers speaker verification” as an enhancement to their security system. This will provide forward-looking organizations with the opportunity to position higher levels of security as a differentiator in the market place, similar to Toyota successfully gaining market advantage with the green-friendly Prius automobile, and Volvo with their emphasis on safety

“According to Cabinet Offices figures, in the UK in 2006, approximately 80,000 cases of identity and impersonation fraud were identified, costing the economy £1.5 billion. It is no surprise then that consumers are looking for improved security and view speaker verification as more secure than traditional means most often used today,” said Ian Turner, General Manager Northern EMEA at Nuance. "With over 300 companies worldwide that have already licensed speaker verification solutions from Nuance, and with independent research, we know that organizations now have the opportunity to improve security in a way that will work, and that their customers will accept and use.”

Related topics:  Authentication and identity management   Eye biometrics   Voice biometrics 

print versionPrint version | email this to a friendEmail to a friend | related articlesRelated articles

 

Other Security news and resources

IT Security white papers and research library

Access Control  Authentication  Data Management  Data Security  Digital Signatures  Email Security  Identity Management  Internet Security  Intrusion Prevention  Network Security  Remote access security  Security Management  Security Policies  Security Software  Security Threats  Virus Detection Software  Virus Protection  VPN  Vulnerability Assessment  Wireless Security 

Security books, guides, standards and toolkits

RFID and Smart Cards books, guides and reference documents  Biometric books, guides and reference documents  CCTV books, guides and reference documents  Intruder alarms and intrusion detection systems books, guides and reference documents  Monitoring and surveillance books, guides and reference documents  IT Governance, ISO 27001 ISO 17799 and BS 7799 toolkits  Fire, Health & Safety books, guides and reference documents





Ensure that you conduct an effective information security risk assessment that is in line with ISO 27001 by purchasing vsRisk™ Risk Assessment Tool

Need a
reference book?
Find it on Amazon:
Security books and magazines in association with Amazon.co.uk

Article search

Directory search


add your company
Google

Accelerate your ISO27001 project and develop an ISO27001-compliant Information Security Management System (ISMS) with the help of this toolkit
Home | About us | Contact us | Submit an article | Advertise | Newsletter | RSS Newsfeed | SEARCH