Biometrics industry needs to educate the public to stop to ill-informed speculation on biometric technology
(18/12/2007)
The recent press coverage of biometric technology in the wake of HMRC losing 25 million records has been negative to say the least. A US academic paper proving that it is possible to partially recreate a fingerprint from unencrypted data has been quoted and more recently six leading academics have written to a Parliamentary committee to express their dismay at the way biometrics has been proposed as a means to secure data.
The national biometric ID programme is back in the spotlight with few supporters. And in the weeks preceding the HMRC data loss, a small group of concerned parents in London suggested “perverts will use (biometric) technology to track your kids”, a Shadow Minister branded the biometric industry “worse than ID thieves”, and anti-biometrics websites run by unqualified campaigners are quoted verbatim in the national press with no attempt to seek comment from industry experts.
How is the UK biometrics industry to respond to ill-informed comment and wild speculation? The answer is simple. Education.
Biometrics is a fast moving, emerging technology. The challenge we faced ten years ago as biometrics began to come to market was again one of education. But opinion was more benign than it is today. The media and public were fascinated by the possibilities offered by biometrics, and our task was to explain how the science worked then speculate on possible applications.
Broadly speaking most people know what biometrics is and have an idea how it works. But biometric technology even a year ago was not so advanced as it is today, and many media commentators are quoting facts that were relevant five years ago.
Today biometric readers are capable of returning error rates that will beat swipe cards or prox fobs hands down. The oft quoted myth that it is possible to cut off someone’s finger and use the dead finger as a key, is just that. Myth. Sub-dermal, multispectral imaging scans the fingerprint surface and the sub-dermal layers. It can tell if blood is pumping through the finger and if not, it will reject the scan.
Another myth is the ‘spoof’ fingerprint recreated from a latent print or the authorised users own fingerprint. Myth. UK Biometrics has tested the J Series sub-dermal reader with over 20,000 spoof fingerprints ranging from the crude to the highly sophisticated. Not one has come close to fooling the scanner. We will continue to test spoof fingerprints and rigorously test the security of our products to ensure the myth of a gifted hacker recreating ID from stolen biometric data remains a myth.
The irony for the biometrics industry in the face of what sometimes appears to be a media onslaught, is that fact that the public, industry, Government and the military are voting with their feet. Biometric technology is protecting nurseries, schools, hospitals, the workplace, data and homes with more people signing up every day. Users, from school children and homeowners to industry bosses universally praise biometrics for its ease of use and the total security it provides.
In the face of this commercial success would be easy enough to simply ignore the media and the public debate. But a bunker mentality will not serve our industry in the long term. It is not pleasant to arrive at work and find the industry you represent branded as helping perverts, but the answer is education and demonstration. The thousands of users of biometric technology throughout the UK differ from ill informed pundits in one vital respect. Adopters of biometric technology have been educated about its benefits and they have had the opportunity to ask searching questions face to face with an expert.
As biometrics becomes ever more familiar technology, this group of educated users will grow. It is the duty of all of us in the biometrics industry to help speed and facilitate that process by engaging in the public debate, presenting the facts and providing honest answers.
Related topics: Authentication and identity management Crime and Fraud Prevention Door entry systems and locks Eye biometrics Face biometrics Fingerprint biometrics Hand biometrics ID card Other biometric systems Smart card Voice biometrics
Print version |
Email to a friend |
Related articles
Other Security news and resources
IT Security white papers and research library
Access Control Authentication Data Management Data Security Digital Signatures Email Security Identity Management Internet Security Intrusion Prevention Network Security Remote access security Security Management Security Policies Security Software Security Threats Virus Detection Software Virus Protection VPN Vulnerability Assessment Wireless Security
Security books, guides, standards and toolkits
RFID and Smart Cards books, guides and reference documents Biometric books, guides and reference documents CCTV books, guides and reference documents Intruder alarms and intrusion detection systems books, guides and reference documents Monitoring and surveillance books, guides and reference documents IT Governance, ISO 27001 ISO 17799 and BS 7799 toolkits Fire, Health & Safety books, guides and reference documents

