Doctors could be held responsible for the theft of their laptops
(16/11/2007)
The Information Commissioner has announced that doctors could be held responsible for the theft of their laptops if it can be proved they were negligent. This will enforce compliance with new data protection laws and ensure doctors take every step in their power to protect their patients’ sensitive data.
This new criminal offence - if implemented - will see doctors fined up to £5,000 in a magistrates court, or an unlimited sum in Crown Court.
Jamie Cowper, Director of European Marketing at PGP Corporation has made the following comments on the news: "On the one hand, this is great news for patient rights groups. Given the recent spate of data breaches at NHS trusts, perhaps Richard Thomas's approach of hard compulsion is the only way to get the medical establishment to take this problem seriously."
"However, by placing the emphasis on protecting the device - specifically laptops - rather than the confidential data itself, he could be accused of treating the symptoms of this problem, rather than providing a cure. What's more, it's not fair to expect doctors to be data security experts. Rather, to be entirely effective, the NHS should respond to the proposed legislation with both a programme of data security education and a systematic roll-out of data protection technology such as encryption."
This announcement has sparked controversy, with Lord Lyell claiming that it is disproportionate to criminalise doctors for losing a laptop. Tom de Jongh, product manager at SafeBoot, feels a much easier way to deal with this situation is to make mobile device encryption mandatory.
“The records held on doctors’ computers are indisputably highly sensitive and action must be taken to prevent loss or theft of data. We are living in a world where cyber crime is on the rise and data theft cases are a daily occurrence. As such, it is good to see that the Information Commissioner is finally starting to think about how to protect the sensitive data doctors carry around with them. The ‘human factor’ is the biggest threat to data and implementing a serious law to ensure this is expelled is important. However, it must be the right law.
“Criminalising doctors for having their laptop stolen sounds to me like cracking a nut with a sledgehammer. The fact is whenever a piece of equipment leaves the doctors environment it has the potential to go missing. With the best intentions in the world things get stolen – this is what I call the ‘human factor’. A doctor cannot guarantee that he or she will not fall victim of a crime and should not be punished for this.
“As such, I feel the first step should be to create legislation stipulating the mandatory use of data encryption. Only if this is ignored should there be a punishment that fits the crime. A robust password and content encryption protocol will ensure that data never reaches the hands of wrongdoers.”
Alan Bentley, Regional VP of Lumension EMEA (formerly PatchLink) commented: "Cases of forgotten or stolen laptops are becoming more and more common, with high profile incidents continuing to surface. While the proposal to fine those responsible for lost laptops is certainly a step in the right direction, it is unlikely to irradiate the problem. This issue needs to be tackled at the source, rather than relying on doctors to guard their laptops."
“Data protection needs to start within the surgery. Meaning, patient records that are not protected in line with data protection laws should simply not be allowed to be transferred onto mobile devices. Policies can be put in place to monitor and control the flow of data, ensuring that only approved data is taken out of the doctor’s surgery and that once data is released it is encrypted to ensure it can not be opened by an unapproved external source."
“The fact that the Information Commissioner is looking to tackle this issue, will no doubt make doctors’ more careful with their laptops. However, it is unlikely to restore public confidence that their private details will be safe. With identity theft at an all time high, it is essential that this issue is addressed head on. It is only by taking a proactive approach to data protection that data held on mobile devices and laptops will be protected from the unexpected.”
Related topics: Computer and PC Security Data management and data security Encryption Legislation Physical protection Security management and policies
Print version |
Email to a friend |
Related articles
Data breaches: Trends, costs and best practices gives you all the latest information on securing personal and corporate data, key recommendations for immediate action to improve data security, and how to respond to data breaches.
Other Security news and resources
Security News
Suppliers Directory
Jobs forum
Classifieds
Knowledge base
White papers
Research library
Security books
Special reports
Security interviews
Security companies
Security events
Security links
Security market
Product channels
Access Control Biometrics CCTV Intruder Alarms IT Security Manned Guarding Perimeter Protection Physical Security Remote Monitoring Security Services Fire, Health & Safety Other Security Products
IT Security white papers and research library
Access Control Authentication Data Management Data Security Digital Signatures Email Security Identity Management Internet Security Intrusion Prevention Network Security Remote access security Security Management Security Policies Security Software Security Threats Virus Detection Software Virus Protection VPN Vulnerability Assessment Wireless Security
Security books, guides, standards and toolkits
RFID and Smart Cards books, guides and reference documents Biometric books, guides and reference documents CCTV books, guides and reference documents Intruder alarms and intrusion detection systems books, guides and reference documents Monitoring and surveillance books, guides and reference documents IT Governance, ISO 27001 ISO 17799 and BS 7799 toolkits Fire, Health & Safety books, guides and reference documents

